The President Can Declassify the Records of the FISA court – FISA JUDGE IS POSSIBLY DIRTY

Keith Davies political correspondent

Congressmen Nunes and Goodlatte chairs of the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees have both requested the records of transcripts for the FISA court. However the presiding judge Rosemary Collyr in her responding letter, while not denying access, points out that this request has never been asked before in the history of the court. In her letter she points out that the executive branch could grant the access which would be records from the DOJ which answers to the President. There also seems to be a bigger problem in that there are no actual transcripts as the court does not actually record the interactions of the Judges and the lawyers representing the FBI/DOJ.

Judge Rosemary Collyr
inset Congressmen Nunes and Goodlatte

The only way to get some idea what actually transcribed between the advocates for the FISA warrant and the Judge would be depose both the Judge (probably Judge Rudolph Contreras) and the attorneys representing the DOJ (probably John Carlin, Mary McCord or other attorneys that were involved in the conspiracy to bring down Trump).

What is the most important question is why the Judge agreed to the warrant as well as its renewal three more times which included a renewal after the time President Trump took office. This means that the intelligence services were spying on their own president using a known fake document to support that spying, with a Judge we know had a strong personal relationship with Eric Holder, the former Attorney General in the Obama administration, as he worked with him closely in his earlier career and were known to be good friends. We also know that Obama appointed Contreras to the bench, and later he was appointed by the Chief Justice to the FISA court.

Federal Judge Rudolph Contreras

The whole thing smells to high heaven. It defies logic that a Judge presented with the “Steele Dossier” (as the primary evidence of probable cause that has no verification and admitted to by the DOJ/FBI in court as per Nunes Memo and FISA Court memorandum/order released in May 2017, on top of this it reads like a bad tabloid newspaper), would grant FISA warrants four times even after it was probably refused by a different judge four months prior to October 2016 when Judge Contreras initially approved the first warrant. We also know that Contreras was FORCED to recuse himself from the General Flynn trial with the new appointed Judge Emmet Sullivan making a very unusual strong ruling that the prosecution needs to provide all the evidence to the defence AFTER the fact. The defendant had already pleaded guilty which should negate the need for such a ruling. The evidence which we have not seen yet in the Flynn case but we know the FISA warrants were illegal and will probably taint any evidence against General Flynn. This is not withstanding the fact that the FD #302 files may also have been tampered with to create fake evidence and frame General Flynn. Judge Sullivan seems to think based on his actions and unusual orders in the General Flynn Case that he suspects an injustice in his court. Judge Sullivan has had previous experience when presiding over federal prosecution malfeasance in a frame up of Senator Ted Stevens (now deceased) prior to an election which falsely tainted his reputation and cost him his relection in Alaska.

It is inconceivable that Judge Contreras was not biased based on the circumstances and facts that are already in the public domain, we need more information but I will not be surprised if this judge is soon replaced on the FISA court before his seven-year term is up, he might even be barred from the bench altogether when the full truth comes out. He might already be suspended from the FISA court with the public not advised of this yet.