Say it with me: More amnesty.
Whenever we think it’s impossible for judges to grow even more lawless, they stun us with their audacious power grabs. In 2016, I wrote a book warning that the courts would start issuing judicial amnesty, but I’m stupefied by the speed with which my prediction came true and even more dumbfounded by the silence from congressional Republicans. Is there nothing the judiciary can do that will elicit a meaningful reaction from Congress or from the so-called legal conservative movement?
Amidst a flurry of insane decisions on immigration and abortion, Judge John Bates, another Republican appointee who sits on the very liberal U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, issued an order demanding that Trump not only hand out renewals to Obama’s illegal DACA program, but that he accept new applications. The administration has already been issuing, on average, 757 renewals since district judges in New York and San Francisco issued judicial amnesty; 64,000 applications have been submitted against the law.
It’s not an exaggeration to suggest that this opinion, coupled with the court cases forcing the president to accept an unlimited number of visas from the Middle East, is the most radical opinion ever to surface from the judiciary in modern history.
An illegal alien can get standing to force a president to violate the law —>
Read the rest from Daniel Horowitz HERE and listen to Mark Levin’s take below:
Levin: ‘This is judicial tyranny. You’re viewing it now.’
If you like what you see, please “Like” us on Facebook either here or here. Please follow us on Twitter here.
Comments are closed.