Jesus' Coming Back

New Novichok claims curiously happen during massively successful World Cup in Russia – analysts

An alleged Novichok poisoning of a British pair some 12 kilometers from Salisbury looks set to breathe new life into the Skripals saga. Analysts told RT it is just what the UK, “hell-bent on vilifying Russia,” wanted.

Charles Rowley, 45 and his girlfriend, Dawn Sturgess, 44, were hospitalized on Saturday after suspected contact with “an unknown substance” that was later declared by UK counter-terrorism chief Neil Basu to be Novichok, the same nerve agent that London claims was used in an attempted assassination of former double agent Sergey Skripal and his daughter, Yulia, on March 4.

While it is yet to be determined how the substance was transmitted and if it was from the same batch that caused the Skripals to slip into a coma, the Skripal case is already back on the front pages.

Read more

The Skripals are alive but the guinea pigs are dead – the strange case of the Salisbury poisoning

Even British Home Secretary Sajid Javid, who has warned against jumping to conclusions and asked to “give space” to police, felt it was appropriate to point out that the Amesbury incident “follows the reckless and barbaric attack” in Salisbury.

Dan Kovalik, an American human and labor rights lawyer, has told RT that while the UK has not pinned blame on anyone as of yet, “it seems to be the British government trying to go out of the way to link the two cases so they can somehow blame Russia.”

The timing of the new poisoning is especially important since it took place during a hugely successful, and so far incident-free, FIFA World Cup in Russia, Kovalik said.

“I also find it very curious that this is all happening during the World Cup in Russia, when Russia is getting a lot of good publicity and Britain seems hell-bent on vilifying Russia.”

It’s almost inevitable that Russia will be dragged into the case, Kovalik agreed, even as he asked rhetorically, “what would be Russia’s intention?It makes no sense.” Just like it wouldn’t have made sense for Russia to poison Sergei Skripal, since “Russians have never killed anyone in spy-swap situation” and there was no reason for Russian intelligence to wait for over 10 years to get to them.

However, this time, with the victims’ lack of any connection to Russia whatsoever, “trying to link them to Russia is just absurd.” 

On the other hand, there is hope that British authorities have “learned the lessons” and will not rush to early conclusions, said Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the UK-based Ramadhan Foundation.

READ MORE:Skripal poisoning case cost taxpayer £7.5 million so far and could rise, PCC says

I hope that the reaction from the British government is going to be more conciliatory than it was in the past.”

One possibility is that the UK will want to use the story to draw attention back to itself, as it seeks a new, more assertive stance after Brexit.

“The important thing here is that Britain is a world power, as is Russia, and we’ve got to change our foreign policy to reflect the new dynamics of the world post-Brexit and I think what is happening subtly is we have a government that is more determined to score headlines than to actually engage in a dialogue.”

Read more

Still multiple leads in Skripal poisoning case, says Scotland Yard

‘First thing to consider: Who benefits & has access to Novichok’

The new Novichok case provides fertile soil for conspiracy theories, but one cannot help but mention that Porton Down, the experimental laboratory in Wiltshire that determined the substance to be a military-grade nerve agent, is itself located in the vicinity of both crime scenes, legal and media analyst Lionel told RT.

“You’ are going to have to ask: Who benefits? It there going to be more diplomatic fallout?” he said.

“The first thing I would ask if I was a spy novelist, if I was a police officer, if I was trying to eliminate possibilities – Porton Down, isn’t that very interesting? It is also not very far from this,” the analyst noted. He added that while he is not suggesting it was a ‘false flag’ attack by British intelligence, it begs the question of who has access to this potentially deadly poison.

The Amesbury incident seems to be a convenient pretext for the UK media to recycle the same accusations against Russia that it made when the Skripal case was in the headlines, he believes.

“They’re going to take the story from before, dust it off and put these peoples’ name in it and just say ‘motive and opportunity, this is classic Russian.’”

Comments are closed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More