The Iraqi Teen Who Murdered Viktorija Sokolova In The UK Did Not Do This For Islam Or Allah- He Was Addicted To Watching Rape Porn, She Was A Known Strumpet, And Her Stepfather Continued To Molest Her Until Her Death
There has been a lot of talk about the case involving the horrible murder of Viktorija Sokolova, the fourteen-year-old daughter of Lithuanian immigrants in the UK who was beaten to death with a hammer by an unnamed teenager from Holland born to Iraqi refugee parents. Many have been lauding the girl as a victim of Islamic violence, and saying that the boy did it for the sake of Islam, and if not saying it then insinuating this conclusion.
However, a further reading of the story is more interesting because it has come out that Viktorija Sokolova was a well-known teenage strumpet in the area who regularly sought the company of men. She had a horrendous home life, as evidence strongly indicates she was routinely molested by her stepfather. The Iraqi teen, who was not named, was also found to be addicted to watching violent “rape porn” on his phone, and it is believed his rage for murdering her was because she did not want to do something he saw in a video:
The 16-year-old-boy convicted of raping Viktorija Sokolova, 14, before beating her to death with a hammer was known to mental health services before his horrific crime.
A serious case review has been launched to discover if Wolverhampton City Council, West Midlands Police or the NHS missed any opportunities to protect Viktorija.
The killer, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was obsessed with extreme porn and violent sex, even Googling it before the murder.
After his arrest, he told officers that he had been diagnosed with anxiety and depression and had come under the care of Child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS).
He was home-schooled for the previous 12 months.
On the launch of the serious case review, Linda Sanders, Independent Chair of Wolverhampton Safeguarding Children Board, said: ‘This was an horrific crime and our thoughts are with the family and friends of Viktorija Sokolova.
‘Wolverhampton Safeguarding Children Board is currently undertaking a multi-agency Serious Case Review which is looking at what involvement, if any, local agencies had with Viktorija and her family, and is seeking to establish whether any lessons can be learned which may improve the way they address potential risks to other children in the future.
‘It is planned that the Serious Case Review will be published next year.’
Viktorija was also known to social services having told police before her death that her home life was ‘not that good’.
The girl’s heartbroken mother earlier paid tribute to her murdered 14-year-old daughter after her 16-year-old killer was convicted of her ‘degrading and ferocious’ murder.
Viktorija Sokolova’s brutalised and half-naked body was found on a bench in Wolverhampton on April 12 this year by a dog walker who initially believed she was an abandoned blow-up doll.
Today her killer, 16 was expressionless as he was convicted of the brutal two-hour ordeal by a jury at the city’s crown court.
The teenager had raped her then bludgeoned her 21 times with a hammer, shattering her skull, teeth and breaking her spine in two.
After she died it was alleged he had sex with her body, but a not guilty verdict was ordered by the judge, who will sentence him in February next year.
Her mother Karolina Valantiniene and stepfather Saidas Valantinas said in a statement she was ‘full of fun and energy’.
The couple added: ‘We were a family, now there are only two of us.
‘Viktorija will never be replaced and will always be missed dearly. She will remain in our hearts forever.
‘We will never be given the opportunity to have grandchildren because this has been taken from us.’
Police seized mobile phones from the killer’s home used to watch extreme pornography, including before he killed Viktorija, and in a legal first ‘lifted’ a fingerprint from the screen to link him to the murder he blamed on her mother and step-father.
The teenage murderer, who was born in Holland to parents from Iraq, had been home schooled in Wolverhampton for the past year because of difficulties in class.
He later blamed learning problems for not giving evidence during his trial – where police described his sophisticated to dispose of evidence linking him to the murder.
The boy cannot be named because of his age – but journalists have appealed to the judge to scrap the order protecting his identity.
The boy lured Viktorija to the park under the pretext they would ‘chill out together’ before launching a murderous assault lasting two hours.
He stripped, raped and beat Viktorija before smashing her head 21 times with a hammer-like weapon until he knocked out three of her teeth and chipped a further six.
He beat her with such force over the back of the skull it ‘snapped her spine in two’ and left her broken body in Wolverhampton’s West Park.
The dog walker who found Viktorija’s battered and bruised body initially believed she was an abandoned blow-up doll.
The boy, who faces an automatic life sentence, was remanded in custody until February 22 after the judge ordered a pre-sentence report.
High Court judge Mr Justice Jeremy Baker said of the defendant: ‘He is still young, 16 years of age.
‘I am obviously concerned as to the extreme nature of the offences in this case and therefore it seems to me that the court ought to be properly informed about all of the background.’
Detectives notched up what is thought to be a legal first while bringing Viktorija Sokolova’s killer to justice – by ‘lifting’ a fingerprint from a mobile phone video.
Officers investigating the killing spotted a recognisable print in a film showing Viktorija’s murderer scrolling through his iPhone for passwords as he prepared to delete evidence linking him to the schoolgirl.
The footage did not show the boy’s face, meaning a fingerprint was the only means of proving he was using the phone.
Jason Corden-Bowen, from the CPS, said: ‘Viktorija Sokolova was a young girl with her whole future ahead of her but her life was cut short by this defendant who murdered her in an apparently motiveless and brutal attack.
‘The defendant denied the offences but the CPS presented evidence to the jury, including forensic evidence, which proved he was responsible.
‘I would like to express my sympathy to Viktorija’s family and loved ones’.
Viktorija, who was subjected to ‘horrific levels of violence’, had abrasions on her chest and abdomen suggesting she had been dragged across the park and propped up against the bench where she was found.
When he was arrested two days after the murder he handed police a prepared statement reading: ‘Know nothing about the murder. Only heard about it on news.’
In an extraordinary trial her defence team later tried to blame her death on her mother Karolina Valantinas and step-father Saidas, after traces of his semen were found on her knickers.
But police never arrested Mr Valantinas because the DNA levels were ‘microscopic’ and could have been transferred innocently.
And the prosecution told the court: ‘Even if you suspect this came from non-innocent contamination, in light of all the evidence in this case, would this provide any evidence for the defence theory that her step-father found her in the park, sexually assaulted her and killed her?’
The boy told officers he had been introduced to Vicktorija last year by two other girls.
He had denied rape, murder and sexual penetration of a corpse.
The jury heard Viktorija moved to the UK from Lithuania in 2011 and was living with her family in Wolverhampton.
The prosecutor said she had a ‘turbulent relationship’ with her parents and social services were aware she often disappeared from home.
The youngster, known to friends as Tori, was reported missing by her family before she was found in the park the following morning.
The defendant had sent Viktorija a video of himself, bare-chested, lifting weights.
He pursued her for eight days before her death, repeatedly asking her to meet him in the park near their homes.
Viktorija made her way to the park at 10.40pm to meet the 16-year-old following a chat on Facebook messenger.
A post-mortem examination concluded she died from a blunt force trauma to the head, which killed her over the space of one hour.
Viktorija’s white jeans and bloodstained underwear, as well as a sock, were found dumped in a litter bin near the boating lake.
Her mobile phone had been hurled onto an island on the lake, adjacent to a pavilion in which she was raped and beaten.
After dragging her to a bench, her killer removed Viktorija’s pink ankle boots ‘which would have made it easier to pull off her jeans and knickers completely,’ the prosecutor said.
Viktorija’s mother Karolina Valantiniene and stepfather Saidas Valantinas have since spoken out against her killer’s defence barristers, who accused them of being responsible for her murder.
Police added that they never considered Saidas Valantinas a murder suspect, despite his semen being found on her underwear – because the sample was ‘microscopic’ and could have been transferred innocently from clothing to clothing in a washing machine.
Factory worker Karolina and her husband Saidas both called the suggestion that they had been involved ‘nonsense’.
Mr Valantinas told the court: ‘In this trial, a lot of dirt has been spilled out.
‘[The defence lawyer] said in a direct way that I had raped her and I killed her. The defence were being quite rude.’
Viktorija’s natural father lives in Ireland and is not implicated in the court case.
A post-mortem examination concluded that Miss Sokolova, originally from Lithuania, died from a blunt force trauma to the head.
Detective Inspector Caroline Corfield, of West Midlands Police’s Homicide Team, said: ‘The sustained nature of the violent attack on a 14-year-old girl is inexplicable.
‘Viktorija was only 14-year-old when she was murdered by her killer who she thought was her friend.
‘They knew each other but they hadn’t had contact for a few months.
‘Then eight days before Viktorija’s murder, he contacted her using Facebook Messenger.
‘She commented herself on the unusual nature of this sudden contact, not having spoken to him in a long time.
‘He was suggesting they leave for London together.
‘Over the course of those eight days, he made a very concerted effort to meet her specifically in West Park at night in the ‘Black House’.’
The detective added: ‘The dog walker] was faced with the horrific scene of Viktorija’s half-naked body bent forwards on a park bench.
‘He initially thought it was a prank. He told the court that he thought it was a blow-up doll.
‘Having been to the scene myself, I can understand why that would be your first reaction because it’s a scene that’s almost impossible to comprehend.
‘The position of the body suggested there was almost certainly a sexual motive to this attack.
‘We found that she had had this contact with her killer immediately before her murder, and the detail of that contact – arranging very specifically to meet her in the Black House in West Park.
‘Some 150 metres from where Viktorija’s body was found is this black wooden shelter and it is clear that that was the main scene of Viktorija’s attack.
‘It was heavily bloodstained. Viktorija’s earrings were found there and the white baseball cap she had been wearing, which was bloodstained.
‘The attack was so violent we found three of her teeth.
‘To this day, I cannot see any explanation for that level of violence.
‘It’s unnecessary, it’s incomprehensible. She was a 14-year-old girl.
‘The reason he was also charged with rape is that we recovered DNA from in and on Viktorija’s body that proved that her killer had had sex with her.
‘If that had been consensual, there is no explanation for Viktorija’s murder.
‘If that had been consensual, then why did Viktorija not leave that park alive?
‘Her killer then proceeded to erase all trace of his contact with her that night – and this is before her body is even found.
‘Her mobile phone was recovered on a small island in the duck pond near to the pavilion.
‘So he had thrown it, I believe, intending for it to go into the water but it actually landed on dry land.
‘Why would her killer want to dispose of her mobile phone unless that was evidence linking the killer to her?
‘The clothing that he was wearing on CCTV heading to the park was very significant because we were able to identify the trainers he was wearing as Adidas Gazelles.
‘He wore them to and from the park.
‘There were footprints in Viktorija’s blood in the pavilion, and the tread pattern of those footwear impressions matches the sole pattern that you get with Adidas Gazelles.
‘We’ve never found those trainers and there’s a very good explanation for that.
‘We pick the defendant up on CCTV at 1.30am – so after he had returned home from the park – and he leaves his home address again.
‘He is wearing different clothing and footwear and he is carrying a rucksack.
‘He returns home an hour later – the rucksack has gone.’
The detective said the killer disposed of his clothes which would have been bloodstained, and they have never been found since.
‘He didn’t give evidence in court so we were never able to ask him ‘what happened to your Adidas trainers? What happened to the clothing you were wearing that night? Why did you delete your Facebook Messenger contact? Why did you hide your iPhone behind a wardrobe in the bedroom?’.
‘We know what the answers to those questions are, and he didn’t want to face the questions.
‘It’s a possibility the weapon he used was in the bag as well. It was suggested by the pathologist that it would be something similar to a hammer, or a hammer-type weapon.
‘Very soon after making the initial contact with Viktorija, eight days before her murder, her killer searched the internet for sites involving anal sex.
‘Specifically, forums talking about what anal sex feels like.
‘Yet at no point in any of the messages between him and Viktorija did he suggest that his intention was to have sex with her.
‘The question wasn’t asked, it wasn’t suggested. In fact, he was very specific that he wanted to meet her to hang out with her and smoke cannabis.
‘Yet the CCTV suggested he was in the park with her for two hours. There wasn’t a trace of cannabis in Viktorija’s body.’
The detective said the boy did not have a history of violence, and spoke about the impact on Viktorija’s family.
He said: ‘It’s impossible to imagine what it is like to learn of a murder of your child – then to hear the horrific details of that murder, which are inescapable because they have to be presented in court.
‘In this particular case, the defence pointed the finger very specifically at Viktorija’s parents.
‘They were asked in court whether they had murdered Viktorija. ‘
He added her parents were never charged nor under investigation. (source, source)
Pornography, while it is morally filthy and brings about decay, is found in all societies throughout human history in some fashion, and because of this it gives an insight into the sentiments, desires, and condition of a people. The more debased the material considered “normal” or accepted, the more debased the society must necessarily be.
Violent pornography has always existed, but is historically considered highly taboo because it often involves physical abuse that would cause even many immoral people to become uncomfortable, as well as to create a potentially difficult legal scenario as it could be classified as rape or sexual assault.
American society is awash in pornographic filth with a culture emphasizing wealth and power and mocking religion and Christianity that increases with each passing day. The result of this has been a downward spiral for decades into a sewage pit of filth that has increasingly redefined culture. Given the global nature of the Internet it is not just limited to the US, but is available for the entire world to consume.
While the trend towards promoting such violent materials were already increasing, its major legitimization began around 2008 with the “work” of a filth peddler name Donald Emil Vollenweider, who calls himself “Duke Skywalker.” He began shooting footage of himself and a friend named David Horter in the East Orange, NJ area of themselves engaged in violent and degrading sex acts with poor black women. These scenes involve serious personal insults, spitting, slapping, punching, drinking urine, being forced to vomit while engaged in sex acts and then eat the vomit, and doing this through cries for help to stop.
The “sex” in the film is rape with a legalistic coating, and he instantly became a topic of major discussion in black circles (one can easily find the name of the original website in many discussions in black media) and remains so to this day. However, his operation has not ceased by only grew and now involves a host of at least five well-known adult websites all with the same theme of rape masquerading as “art”.
There is nothing funny about this person, and not just because he is a filth peddler, but because of the sadistic nature of his actions and that his “business model” is rooted it legitimizing such evils for his personal benefit.
This is a compilation of clips from his videos. This does not contain pornographic images. I am including this because the voice is of Vollenweider, and he is incredibly abusive to these people just in conversation. It has to be heard to be believed.
It is highly likely that this Iraqi man who was consumed by watching violent pornography was watching regularly some of the abominations of Mr. Vollenweider. The teen was less influenced by religion than he was by a New Jersey filth peddler who has legitimized rape as normal relations between men and women.
A talk given by a feminist at Eastern Connecticut State University. There is no pornographic content in it. While I do not agree with all of her points and some are objectively incorrect, she does provide a decent analysis of what are common practices including audio from 56:55 to 1:02:57
But there is another side to this as well, which is that in spite of the reputation this person has and his “brand,” women line up to come and work for him. This is more than simple prostitution, stripping, or other forms of “easy money,” but this is signing up to be raped on camera in highly degrading ways. While the directors are to blame, the women hold an equal amount of blame because of the continual willingness to subject themselves to total degradation for a few dollars. Thus one cannot say that the women are just “innocent victims” because this series of websites has an infamous reputation that, as noted above, has been long discussed in black American circles and beyond. A person who goes to this pimp knows what to expect and is asking for whatever happens.
Viktorija Sokolova was not innocent at all in her actions. At the story notes, she was well-known to the UK child welfare agencies, and she had a known reputation in her area and with the government for prostituting herself. As with many cases involving such people, it is likely that she was doing so for drugs or money. She was already in serious danger and it was a matter of time before, as with most prostitutes, they are jailed or found dead. Her family clearly did not help her situation, and they seem to have been a large part of the reason why she engaged in such behaviors, because she was being raped by her stepfather and from what one can tell, there was not much her mother was doing to better the situation in a practical sense.
Sokolova should not have died the way that she did, and it was wrong and evil for the teenager to murder her. However, there is much blame to go around. This is not a simple case of “Muslim kills nice European girl”, but of a multitude of evils consuming each other as evil always does. Religion aside, of which it is still yet to be confirmed definitively, the Iraqi teen was clearly being influenced by a sick pimp who earned his wealth by peddling intellectual filth and perversity of the worst order to anybody who would view it, which does not exonerate him for his actions but is proof of the deadly and known effects that such materials have on many people, including driving them to murder as it did with serial killer Ted Bundy. The girl bears responsibility for her actions, yet much of the problems lay with her stepfather and mother, for if they cared about the welfare of their daughter they would have taken the efforts to get the help she would need, whatever that may be, instead of molest her regularly.
This is an important story not merely to discuss social decline, but to point out causes and effects, and how the refusal to address and toleration of evils has lead to destructive effects for all. It is dishonest and unhelpful to try to frame the story in terms of religion, because the only god that all of these people- the Iraqi teen, Viktorija, and her parents -served was the world and the flesh, and as St. Paul says, the wage of sin is death.
Comments are closed.