Truth is stranger than fiction, and this is no truer than with the current presidential elections, where the Democrats are putting forth candidates that clearly cannot with. The current favorite being heavily promoted is the sodomite Pete Buttigieg, an open sodomite whose last name, Maltese in origin, comes from the Arabic “Abu Ad-Dajjaj,” meaning “father of chickens”, which given the phraseology would be better translated as “king of chickens” or perhaps, “king of cocks.”
A sodomite whose name means “The king of cocks” is running to be president of the US. How fitting, and it is without a doubt a subtle mockery of the current state of the US, a nation whose people have embraced sodomy by the super majority and as such, means the nation is on the road to perdition.
Now Buttigieg has almost no chance of winning due to a multiplicity of reasons. However, what he is doing is to set a precedent in preparation for the future election, namely that of 2024 when the Democrats will likely have power shift to them.
2016 saw the first serious woman run for president in the figure of Hillary Clinton, who was loved by millions and received a majority of the votes among the American people, as Trump won due to the Electoral College. The nation has shown its willingness to accept a woman for a president just as it accepted a black man for a president with Obama in 2008.
The rise of sodomy in the US as an accepted lifestyle practice directly correlates with the support that Buttigieg is receiving. However, most of his support will be among dedicated Democrats. Men of all party alignments, while a majority of which support the LGBT, are not per se ready to “elect” a sodomite like Buttigieg, who is “married” and is rather effeminate based on his looks.
Buttigieg gives the impression of a Mitt Romney- one looks at him, and one does not exactly feel “attracted” (in the sense of supporting him) to him, or that he would be “strong” enough to “lead America,” even though the real leadership comes from bankers and industrialists with specific names and family lineages which are well-known and have been discussed extensively.
What then if these two trends were to be combined together? What if it were to be a woman and a sodomite, who just so happens also to have a religious background while being non-religious herself, and has a physical “look” and lifestyle that would seduce people to vote for her? I speak of a modern-day woman of sin, and who like the “father of cocks” also carries the name of sin in her name, that being Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.
She is an objectively attractive sodomite, having been married to a man but has since chosen to leave her husband and assume a new residence at the gardens of Gomorrah. She is physically fit and keeps active regularly, having recently competed in a marathon in New Zealand. She has stood publicly against many Democrat policies considered repugnant by Republicans, and gives the impression of being a “reasonable” person with something of an independent mind- the “strong business woman” that so enamors Americans of all races and many classes.
And did I mention that she is a sodomite? A white and blonde lesbian, to be specific. Since lesbianism- a form of sodomy condemned by Sacred Scripture -is the top sexual fantasy of American men and has been for decades, her very lifestyle would seduce many a voter regardless of political affiliation to stand with her, especially if done in collaboration with her already held public persona. There would be more than a few Republicans who would experiment with voting Democrat if she was on the ballots. With the Baby Boomers having one last major election in 2020 before they continue their descent into the annals of history to which all generations eventually go, Trump is likely going to be their last major president whose election they will influence before finally passing the majority of what influence they had to what is left of Generation X, the Millennials, and Gen Z, the latter who are on waiting lists to buy in the same neighborhood in which Lot put his house for sale.
Many who voted for Hillary chanted the mantra that “the future is female.” It is a known fact that the future involves a visit to the plains of Middle Ghor, where Sodom once stood before being annihilated by fired from Heaven. But what if the future were both female and Sodom?
It is a possibility that one should not overlook, whether it be Sinema or another woman of sin, or even a man, because it does not really matter who the person is, but rather the principle expressed by the person.
All elections are reflections in the mirror of the public self. People vote for candidates who most look like them, and most politics is spent over a candidate attempting to make himself look like the people he sees so to compel them to vote for him, of which the media does play a role in helping influence, but ultimately comes down to the people themselves, for one truly can only influence a person and never force him to choose something evil. For example, even the best of marketers could scarcely penetrate the souls of many a man in sub-Saharan African to bend over for the sodomite agenda, as many of the sons of Ham there still have not forgotten the law of God written on their hearts and the hearts of all men.
The results of a given series of conclusions are determined by choices which came from previous choices. The support of the LGBT in the US did not come out of nothing, as once upon a time the opposition to these things was just as normal as it is in most of Africa. It was choices, little by little, that ate away at the Faith which brought the European peoples out of barbarism to civilization and has largely turned them back into the pagans they once were, this time with the veneer of civilization.
The 2020 election is not a relevant presidental election, but 2024 will be. The “father of cocks” has a unknown chance at getting the nomination for the Democrat party, and there is a high likelihood he will not win if he is chosen to represent the Democrat party. However, his presence is setting up a precedent that may allow for the nomination of a candidate in the future, be it a woman, sodomite, or both, or more, who will bring the nation further down the road to hell that she has already chosen to travel, for the driver of the cab goes only where the passenger tells him.
Comments are closed.