Aysha Rabi, the victim of an alleged attack by Jewish youth in the West Bank. (photo credit: Courtesy)
X ![]()
Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.
As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.
For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:
- A user experience almost completely free of ads
- Access to our Premium Section
- Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew – Ivrit
- A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel
Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.
Thank you,
Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief
UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later
A district court judge, Hagai Tarsi, ruled on Tuesday that there is enough evidence to try a 16-year-old Jewish teen for committing a terrorist attack that killed Aysha al-Rabi, a Palestinian woman from the West Bank.
In 2018, Al-Rabi, a mother of eight, was driving on a West Bank road near an Israeli settlement when her car was pelted with stones. Five Jewish minors were arrested in connection with the incident. The judge noted that there was DNA belonging to the deceased, her husband and the defendant on the stone that hit al-Rabi.
“His and only his,” the judge ruled. “There is no dispute that the Jewish minor touched the stone.”
The judge also said that this evidence could “lead to a high level of likelihood” of convicting the minor.
Additionally, the judge said that the defendant’s silence, even before he became a suspect, strengthened the court’s evidence. Furthermore, the defendant did not establish an alibi.
The father of the defendant claimed that the head of the Yeshiva of Pri Ha’aretz, where the minor has been studying, has testified that the teen was at a Shabbat gathering at the time of the killing of al-Rabi, but did not provide details regarding timing.
The judge said the compilation of facts and evidence could “reasonably lead to the respondent’s conviction in the indictment.”
Until now, no one beside the Shin Bet knew what evidence they had regarding al-Rabi’s death.
Aside from being a Jewish terror case, the case also served to reanimate a debate over the Shin Bet’s aggressive handling of Jews accused of terror. Some argue that Jewish terror suspects should be treated the same as Palestinian terrorists, while others say no and said specifically that in this case the Shin Bet violated the rights of the five teen suspects. There has also been a debate whether or not, the minors were mistreated while under police interrogation.
While the minors were not allowed to talk to their lawyers for an extended period of a time (between five days to almost two weeks), no one has claimed that the Shin Bet used enhanced interrogation techniques on them. It is now understood that one reason that the Shin Bet might have kept the minors in their custody for so long is because of this DNA evidence.
It is not yet clear what will be the fate of the other minors originally arrested.
Yonah Jeremy Bob contributed to this report.
Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>
Comments are closed.