***LIVE UPDATES*** Alexander Vindman, Jennifer Williams Testify in Impeachment Hearing
The House Intelligence Committee on Tuesday is holding its third public hearing as part of the House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.
Congressional investigators will hear testimony from Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council official, and Jennifer Williams, a Russia adviser for Vice President Mike Pence. Vindman delivered a closed-door deposition before the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight committees on October 29, and Williams appeared before the panels on November 7.
Vindman is the first witness to testify that he heard President Trump’s July 25 telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, which a partisan CIA analyst mischaracterized in a so-called “whistleblower” complaint that sparked the impeachment inquiry. Vindman’s testimony shows he was deeply frustrated by the Trump administration’s shift away from the “interagency consensus” on policy regarding Ukraine, his transcript shows. Tim Morrison, who formally served as Vindman’s superior at the NSC, said in his own closed-door deposition that he had doubts about the Lt. Col’s judgment. In his testimony, Vindman could not state whether he viewed President Trump’s conduct during his call with Zelensky as unlawful, but said he believed it was “wrong.”
Williams was one of the few White House staff members who heard the Trump-Zelensky call. She testified that President Trump asked Pence not to attend Zelensky’s May inauguration, but conceded she only possessed second-hand knowledge of the purported exchange. “My understanding from my colleague—and, again, I wasn’t there for the conversation—was that the President asked the Vice President not to attend,” she told lawmakers.
**Follow live updates on this event from Breitbart News. All times in eastern.**
1:40 P.M. — The hearing is now adjourned. Tim Morrison and Kurt Volker are scheduled to testify at 2:30 p.m.
1:39 P.M. — Schiff: “Ukraine is fighting our fight against the Russians, against their expansionism. That’s our fight too. That’s why we support Ukraine with the military aid that we have.”
1:39 P.M. —
Rep. Adam Schiff: “The real message to Ukraine, our U.S. policy message is, don’t engage in political investigations.
“The message from the president, however, was the exact opposite: do engage in political investigations, and do it for my reelection.” https://t.co/wJIckfThSv pic.twitter.com/79oiXLO6Cz
— ABC News (@ABC) November 19, 2019
1:37 P.M. — Schiff is delivering his closing statement:
Schiff uses Vindman’s testimony – and Yovanovitch’s – to challenge Republicans’ argument that Trump just wants to fight corruption
— Alana Abramson (@aabramson) November 19, 2019
1:32 P.M. — Nunes says in his closing statement: “Act one of today’s circus is over.”
1:30 P.M. —
It is frankly stunning that the Democrats are building an impeachment case off of an *interpretation* of a call from someone who has never met POTUS, never talked to POTUS, and who’s interpretation is directly disputed by multiple others who have.
Stunning.
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 19, 2019
1:27 P.M. — Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) claims Vindman appears to be attacked because he’s an immigrant and references remarks by Fox News hosts.
1:25 P.M. — Vindman on the relationship between Russia and Ukraine: “It’s stable, but it’s still a hot war”
1:23 P.M. — Vindman on why he reported the Trump-Zelensky call: “Frankly, I couldn’t believe what I was hearing.” It “was my duty,” he continues. “This is America. This is the country I have served and defended,” he adds. “Here, right matters.” Small applause breaks out.
Rep. Maloney asks Lt. Col. Vindman to re-read the message for his father that he shared in his opening statement.
Vindman says his father “deeply worried” about him testifying about the president, but “this is America … and here, right matters.” https://t.co/VZ7umURpu1 pic.twitter.com/u2nXpSI9Oq
— World News Tonight (@ABCWorldNews) November 19, 2019
1:22 P.M. —
now Maloney is making Vindman read the part of his statement that addresses his dad again
— Alexandra Petri (@petridishes) November 19, 2019
1:21 P.M. —
#Vindman on what crossed his mind when he heard #Trump on the call: “Frankly I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. I twas a moment of shock. It was my worst fear of how our #Ukraine policy was playing out & it was going to have serious implications for U.S. national security.”
— Alex Miller (@AlexMillerNews) November 19, 2019
1:17 P.M. — Oh dear:
Rep. Peter Welch to Trump on probing the Bidens : “Do it hard. Do it dirty. Just don’t do it by asking a foreign leader to help you in your campaign.”
— Allan Smith (@akarl_smith) November 19, 2019
1:09 P.M. — Jordan: “Democrats don’t trust the American people” and have “been out to get” President Trump since he was elected. “It is sad, it is scary, it is wrong,” he adds of the impeachment probe.
.@Jim_Jordan references @speakerpelosi‘s comments to @facethenation that @realDonaldTrump is an “impostor” for attacking witnesses: “The speaker’s statement says it all. The Democrats have never accepted the will of the American people,” Jordan says. https://t.co/hE9eycyQi7 pic.twitter.com/0OEikI27V7
— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) November 19, 2019
1:08 P.M. — Meadows: “To say this impeachment case is collapsing is an understatement.”
.@Jim_Jordan asks Col. Vindman why he didn’t go to his boss, Tim Morrison, and instead went to a lawyer. Vindman says it was a busy week… and that eventually, the lawyer told him not to go to anyone else.
To say this impeachment case is collapsing is an understatement.
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 19, 2019
1:01 P.M. — Jordan says Vindman did not follow the chain of command. “Representative Jordan, I did my job,” he replies.
12:59 P.M. — Ratcliffe says if Vindman and Williams can’t agree on whether President Trump made a demand, then it’s impossible for Congress to.
12:57 P.M. — Ratcliffe asks Williams whether she believes President Trump made a “demand” of Zelensky on the July 25 call. She refers back to the call transcript, which shows the president requesting a “favor.”
12:55 P.M. —
Vindman calls the theory that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election – as put forth frequently by Nunes – a “Russian narrative” that has no evidence he’s aware of.
— Kate Irby (@kateirby) November 19, 2019
12:54 P.M. —
Rep. @JoaquinCastrotx to Lt. Col. Alex Vindman: “It’s great to talk to a fellow identical twin. I hope that you brother is nicer to you than mine is to me and doesn’t make you grow a beard.” pic.twitter.com/4LnhrTyWTY
— CSPAN (@cspan) November 19, 2019
12:48 P.M. — Million-dollar question from Jordan:
Lt. Col. Vindman says he doesn’t know the “Whistleblower’s” identity.@RepAdamSchiff claims he doesn’t know the “Whistleblower’s” identity.
So how is asking who Lt. Col. Vindman spoke to “outing the ‘Whistleblower?’”
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) November 19, 2019
12:47 P.M. —
#Vindman tells Rep. Hurd that it’s not odd the president didn’t use Vindman’s talking points on #Ukraine.
— Alex Miller (@AlexMillerNews) November 19, 2019
12:43 P.M. — Williams says she place a transcript of the Trump-Zelensky telephone call in Vice President Pence’s intelligence briefing book.
12:4o P.M. — Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) re-ups her call for Hunter Biden testify as part of the impeachment probe.
Corruption is Hunter Biden scoring a $50K monthly gig with Ukraine energy firm Burisma while his dad @JoeBiden led US policy on Ukraine.
Hunter Biden must testify.
— Sen. Marsha Blackburn (@MarshaBlackburn) November 19, 2019
12:38 P.M. — Vindman and Williams agree that Hunter Biden serving on Burisma’s board of directors has the potential for a conflict of interest.
Rep. Elise Stefanik: “Do you agree that Hunter Biden on the board of Burisma has the potential for the appearance of a conflict of interest?”
NSC official Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman: “Certainly, the potential, yes.”
Pence aide Jennifer Williams: “Yes.”
https://t.co/RAetPEfRpJ pic.twitter.com/0YdcIm4dnP— Deena Zeina Zaru 👩🏻💻 (@Deena_Zaru) November 19, 2019
12:36 P.M. —
Vindman says no officials in the national security community, the State Department, and the Defense Department supported withholding military aid from Ukraine.
— Daniel Bush (@DanielBush) November 19, 2019
12:32 P.M. — Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) explains why Rep. Chris Stewart’s (R-UT) exchange with Vindman is important:
This is an excellent job by @RepChrisStewart. He’s getting to the heart of the issue — that the characterization of the 7/25 phone call as a “demand” (by both Chairman Schiff and Lt. Col. Vindman) is total nonsense.
We can all read the transcript. There is zero demand there.
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 19, 2019
12:31 P.M. —
Stewart and Vindman get into a key question — whether Trump’s request was a demand.
Vindman argues that it was clear in the context of the July 10 meeting that it was “not simply a request.”
“Well that’s not true at all. That’s not clear at all,” Stewart shot back.
— Jeremy Herb (@jeremyherb) November 19, 2019
12:30 P.M. — President Trump weighs in on Vindman’s testimony.
President Trump: “Vindman, I watched him for a little while this morning and I think he — I’m going to let people make their own determination. But I don’t know Vindman, I never heard of him, I don’t know any of these people.” https://t.co/xD2yvtC74T pic.twitter.com/apuY7Pa2R6
— World News Tonight (@ABCWorldNews) November 19, 2019
12:29 P.M. — Ukrainian President Zelensky says Ukrainians are “so tired” with impeachment questions, reports Politico. “We have our own country. We have our independence, we have our problems and questions. That’s it,” he adds.
12:27 P.M. —
As GOP Rep. Stewart questions Vindman on why he wanted Nunes to address him as “Lt. Col.” instead of “Mr.,” Vindman says “the attacks I’ve had in the press and Twitter have kind of” served to marginalized “me as a military officer”
— Allan Smith (@akarl_smith) November 19, 2019
12:22 P.M. — President Trump jokes about George Kent, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs who testified in last week’s impeachment hearing:
Trump refers to George “Kent with the nice bow-tie” – “maybe I’ll get myself one…”
— Charlie Spiering (@charliespiering) November 19, 2019
12:21 P.M. —
Vindman says that since the report on Trump’s Ukraine call, he has been “excluded from several meetings that would have been appropriate for my position” https://t.co/OZ2lHu07Z6 pic.twitter.com/1pR50sZcPw
— CBS News (@CBSNews) November 19, 2019
12:20 P.M. — Vindman says “certainty the president is well within his right” to ask for probes.
Vindman: “certainty the president is well within his right” to ask for investigationshttps://t.co/7zCI454fjj pic.twitter.com/a67HzmmzQd
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) November 19, 2019
12:18 P.M. —
Wenstrup says that instead of going to his direct report, Tim Morrison (who testifies this afternoon), Vindman went to John Eisenberg, the NSC legal advisor. “Mr. Morrison is your senior, he didn’t know about it,” Wenstrup says.
— Bill Rehkopf (@BillRehkopf) November 19, 2019
12:12 P.M. —
Schiff says Democrats didn’t ask witnesses about bribery because “it will be our job to decide whether the impeachable act of bribery has occurred.”
— Daniel Bush (@DanielBush) November 19, 2019
12:08 P.M. — Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH_ asks Vindman if he personally advised President Trump. Vindman says he only prepared briefing materials.
12:05 P.M. — Vindman on Giuliani’s activities regarding Ukraine:
Vindman says Rudy Giuliani’s involvement in foreign affairs “certainly wasn’t helpful, and it didn’t help advance U.S. national security interests” https://t.co/OZ2lHu07Z6 pic.twitter.com/OChsakqRVH
— CBS News (@CBSNews) November 19, 2019
12:01 P.M. — Important point by Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX):
Rep. Ratcliffe: Dems’ narrative has changed from “quid pro quo” to “extortion” to “bribery”https://t.co/hhD3sBBl8K pic.twitter.com/OFM6QwUgMH
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) November 19, 2019
11:56 A.M. — The celebrated Rev. Franklin Graham weighs in on today’s hearings:
It makes me sick to my stomach. We’re now in the 2nd week of the impeachment inquiry & this is just dividing our country even further. Pres. @realDonaldTrump‘s enemies are focused on destroying him & his presidency regardless of the damage it does to our nation. 1/3
— Franklin Graham (@Franklin_Graham) November 19, 2019
Let’s look at Pres. @realDonaldTrump‘s record. The US economy is better than it has ever been, the stock market is at its highest levels, Trump has made key conservative judicial appointments as promised, unemployment is the lowest it has been in 50+ yrs. Should I continue? 2/3
— Franklin Graham (@Franklin_Graham) November 19, 2019
Pray for President @realDonaldTrump & his family as the Democrats in Washington continue to try to destroy him & drag his name through the mud. Everyone is benefiting from his policies—even those who want to tear him down. 3/3
— Franklin Graham (@Franklin_Graham) November 19, 2019
11:55 A.M. —
Lt. Col. Vindman was asked by CT Rep. Himes about the Purple Heart
Vindman said in 2004 he was involved in “probably the largest urban operation in decades” outside of Fallujah, Iraq, while he was serving in the war.
The vehicle he was traveling in hit an IED and he was injured
— FOX61 (@FOX61News) November 19, 2019
11:54 A.M. —
Dem. Rep. Jim Himes: “Colonel Vindman, would you call yourself a ‘Never Trumper?'”
Lt. Col. Vindman: “Representative, I’d call myself ‘Never Partisan.'” https://t.co/wJIckfThSv #ImpeachmentHearings pic.twitter.com/S9FJVpVJgk
— ABC News (@ABC) November 19, 2019
11:52 A.M. —
Rep. Himes: “Ms. Williams, are you a never-Trumper? … would you describe yourself that way?”
Williams: “No”
— Norah O’Donnell🇺🇸 (@NorahODonnell) November 19, 2019
11:47 A.M. —
Ken Starr: Schiff “long ago left the idea of being the fair and balanced chair”https://t.co/IrH4DD9JBe pic.twitter.com/sBlOjt3Egk
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) November 19, 2019
11:45 A.M. — Jordan tells Schiff “no one believes you” about not knowing who the so-called “whistleblower” is.
11:44 A.M. — Vindman on whether he ever leaked: “I never did, never would, that is preposterous that I would do that.”
WATCH: Rep. Jim Jordan: “You never leaked information?”
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman: “I never did, never would. That is preposterous that I would do that.”#ImpeachmentPBS pic.twitter.com/fFVJJHpzqK
— PBS NewsHour (@NewsHour) November 19, 2019
11:43 A.M. — Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) begins his questioning by raising Morrison’s testimony regarding his concerns about Vindman‘s judgment. Vindman replies by reading Fiona Hill’s praises of him in which she said he was ‘brilliant.”
11:39 A.M. —
Adam Schiff just opened part 2 of this hearing by pushing back on whether the witnesses have “firsthand knowledge” of anything on Biden, Burisma, etc.
So “firsthand knowledge” evidently counts on matters implicating Democrats—but not when relating to @realDonaldTrump.
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 19, 2019
11:38 A.M. —
Schiff: “Was there any ambiguity about the president’s use of the word ‘Biden’?”
Vindman: “There was not.”
Schiff: “It was pretty clear that the president wanted Zelenskiy to commit to investigating the Bidens, was it not?”
Vindman: “That is correct” https://t.co/QfMpJlStvo pic.twitter.com/LotJLnn1YY
— This Week (@ThisWeekABC) November 19, 2019
11:36 A.M. — The hearing’s now resumed.
Impeachment witnesses Jennifer Williams and Alexander Vindman return for more questioning after a brief break. As Vindman walks by Williams, who entered before him and is standing at the table, he reaches to turn her chair toward her to make it easier for her to sit.
— Anthony Zurcher (@awzurcher) November 19, 2019
11:23 A.M. — The hearing is now on recess.
11:23 A.M. — The U.S. Army will not “confirm or deny” reports stating Vindman and his family are moving to a military base.
On preps to move Vindman family military base @USArmy will not “confirm or deny” but “the Army will work with civilian authorities to ensure that he and his family are properly protected.” – Spox
— Mary Walsh (@CBSWalsh) November 19, 2019
11:20 A.M. — Vindman confirms he’s never had contact with President Trump.
“I’ve never had any contact with the president of the United States” – Lt. Col. Vindman
The Democrats’ key witnesses have never even spoken to the man they’re claiming know the motives of
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 19, 2019
11:17 A.M. — Vindman seemingly mocks Giuliani: “I only know him as New York’s finest mayor.”
11:16 A.M. —
LTC Vindman calls David Holmes, who was deposed by House Intel last Friday, a “delightful fellow.” Says Holmes overheard Ukrainian offer him position of defense minister with the Ukrainian government.
— John R Parkinson (@jparkABC) November 19, 2019
11:10 A.M. — Vindman says he turned down the role of Ukrainian defense minister three times and reported it to his chain of command. “I’m an American. The whole notion is rather comical that I was being asked to be Minister of Defense,” he says on why he turned down the offer.
GOP counsel: “Did [former Ukrainian national security secretary Oleksandr Danyliuk] offer you a position of defense minister with the Ukranian government?”
Lt. Col. Vindman: “He did…every single time, I dismissed it. Upon returning, I notified my chain of command.” pic.twitter.com/d4xHN2a1l9— CBS Evening News (@CBSEveningNews) November 19, 2019
11:08 A.M. —
However, when Castor asks about the 7/10 post-meeting meeting in a different conference room, Vindman does say that yes, 2016, Bidens & Burisma were explicitly mentioned by Sondland to Ukrainians. (Background: per Fiona Hill, Bolton ends scheduled meeting abruptly & Sondland +
— GovTrack.🇺🇸 (@govtrack) November 19, 2019
11:01 A.M. —
Republican counsel asking Williams about why VP Pence’s trip to Zelensky’s inauguration was cancelled. Williams testifies she doesn’t know why it was stopped, only that President stopped it. “I’m not in a position to speculate on the President’s motivation”
— amna (@IAmAmnaNawaz) November 19, 2019
10:57 A.M. — Vindman’s refusal to discuss the so-called “whistleblower” is getting a lot of attention:
Vindman not wanting to discuss who in the intelligence community he talked to about this whole thing. Schiff cuts off question.
Very interesting.
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 19, 2019
Remember – Adam Schiff once told the American people Congress WOULD hear from the “whistleblower.” Now, he’s blocking questions to get to the bottom of how this impeachment inquisition started.
This isn’t a fair process. This isn’t due process. This is Adam Schiff’s process.
— Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) November 19, 2019
It’s pretty remarkable that both Vindman and Schiff claim to be unaware of the identity of the “whistleblower,” but both know precisely when to cut off questions about him.
— Tim Murtaugh (@TimMurtaugh) November 19, 2019
10:56 A.M. — Vindman says Hunter Biden did not appear qualified to serve on Burisma’s board of directors.
Vindman: “as far as I can tell” Hunter Biden did not have qualifications for Burisma’s boardhttps://t.co/sUmGQWtXpm pic.twitter.com/izPoqnZSVs
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) November 19, 2019
10:55 A.M. — Vindman acknowledges he’s aware of President Trump’s skepticism about foreign aid.
10:53 A.M. — Castor asks whether President Trump has concerns about corruption in Ukraine. Vindman replies he does not recall, but there are general concerns in the U.S.
10:52 A.M. —
Castor: If the concerns were so great, why not alert Pence or his staff?
Williams: Keith Kellogg was on the call— Tom LoBianco (@tomlobianco) November 19, 2019
10:50 A.M. — Williams on the Trump-Zelensky call: “I did not discuss the call with anyone inside or outside the White House.”
10:48 A.M. —
Castor asks Williams & Vindman both if the call summary is correct. Vindman says it’s substantively so; Williams says the term “Burisma” was skipped in a different part of the call summary. Neither seems to think any existing discrepancies are important.
— GovTrack.🇺🇸 (@govtrack) November 19, 2019
10:46 A.M. —
Schiff pauses Nunes’ questioning to make sure there is “no effort to out the whistleblower” in the hearing https://t.co/OZ2lHu07Z6 pic.twitter.com/QkXrSOerYw
— CBS News (@CBSNews) November 19, 2019
10:44 A.M. — Vindman clarifies Nunes should address him as “lieutenant colonel.”
Nunes: “Mr. Vindman, you testified in your deposition that you did not know the whistle-blower.”
Vindman: Ranking member, Lieutenant Colonel Vindman please.”
Nunes: “Lieutenant Colonel Vindman….” pic.twitter.com/Or2m697Xqy
— Tom Namako (@TomNamako) November 19, 2019
10:43 A.M. —
Nunes now asking Vindman who he discussed the Trump-Zelenskiy call with.
After a few questions, Schiff interjects that they don’t want to out the whistleblower, prompting groans from GOP members.
— Ben Siegel (@benyc) November 19, 2019
10:41 A.M. —
Williams and Vindman both say they did not discuss the July 25th call with any member of the press.
— Jackson Proskow (@JProskowGlobal) November 19, 2019
10:39 A.M. —
I am struck by Schiff’s attempt to characterize President Trump’s conversation with President Zelensky as a “demand.” It was not a demand.
Note Vindman’s quote when pressed on this characterization in his deposition. Page 256.
“I guess you can interpret it in different ways.”
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 19, 2019
10:37 A.M. — Nunes posses the same questions about Hunter Biden and Burisma to Vindman, who gives similar answers to Williams.
10:36 A.M. —
Minority questioning has begun. Nunes now asking if Williams was familiar with Ukrainians opposing candidate Trump, Biden/Burisma, (possible) actions of Biden during Obama administration. Williams says not until this investigation began.
— GovTrack.🇺🇸 (@govtrack) November 19, 2019
10:31 A.M. —
.@VP Pence’s office tells me of the Sept 18th call between Pence, Zelensky being classified (which Williams testified to): “The call remains classified since the day of the call. It is standard procedure for world leader calls…”
— Elizabeth Landers (@ElizLanders) November 19, 2019
10:28 A.M. — Williams: “President Zelensky asked Vice President Pence about the status of the security aid because he saw the Politico article that it was being withheld. Zelensky explained that it was the symbolic nature of the assistance.”
10:27 A.M. — Vindman: “My impression is that in order to get the White House meeting, President Zelensky would have to deliver the investigations.”
10:24 A.M. — Important points to remember:
Remember → There is still no due process in these hearings.
❌ The President doesn’t get to request witnesses.
❌ The President’s attorneys are not allowed in the room.
❌ All of Adam Schiff’s witnesses have already auditioned for their roles.— Kevin McCarthy (@GOPLeader) November 19, 2019
10:22 A.M. — Vindman says President Trump did not mention “corruption” in both his calls with Zelensky.
10:20 A.M. — Vindman says the phrase “there are recordings” was left out from the Trump-Zelensky call transcript.
10:17 A.M. —
🚨🚨🚨 NO PRESSURE ALERT 🚨🚨🚨
Consistent with the statements from Ukrainian leaders, Vindman testifies that he did not hear from any Ukrainians about pressure to enact investigations.
Nor did he discuss demands for investigations w/ officials at the Ukrainian Embassy in D.C. pic.twitter.com/u4VekGtLlj
— Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) November 19, 2019
10:15 A.M. — Vindman says the Trump-Zelensky call transcript was segregated to a secure server to “preserve the integrity” of the documents.
10:10 A.M. —
Goldman: “You said it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see the political benefits of [President Trump’s] demands explain?”
Vindman: “To investigate a political opponent was inappropriate and improper. I made that connection as soon as [President Trump] brought up the Biden investigation.”
10:09 A.M. —
Goldman: What languages do you speak?
Vindman: “I speak Russian, Ukrainian and a little bit of English.”
10:08 A.M. — Daniel Goldman, the House Democrats’ general counsel, asks Vindman and Williams if they are aware of evidence that former Vice President Joe Biden acted inappropriately with Ukraine. They both say no.
10:07 A.M. —
asked if he knows of any evidence that Ukraine interfered in the US election of 2016, a charge Pres Trump has made, National Security Council Director, Col. Alex Vindman says “I am not”
— Judy Woodruff (@JudyWoodruff) November 19, 2019
10:04 A.M. — Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) busts the New York Times for spreading fake news about Vindman’s actions:
This Tweet from @nytpolitics is just not accurate. Actually LTC Vindman didn’t state his concerns about the 7/25 call to his superior Tim Morrison or anyone up the Vindman/Morrison Chain of Command. Although it does appear one of the people Vindman spoke to was the whistleblower. https://t.co/jvXDLHhypq
— Lee Zeldin (@RepLeeZeldin) November 19, 2019
10:03 A.M. — Vindman: “It is the consensus of the entire intelligence community that Russia interfered in the elections of 2016.”
10:02 A.M. —
Vindman has a habit of making assumptions with no evidence about President Trump’s motives. He’s offering opinions without evidence – and Chairman Schiff is allowing him to persist.
Lest we forget, Vindman has admitted that the TRANSCRIPT is ACCURATE.
— Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) November 19, 2019
9:57 A.M. — Vindman and Williams testify that Burisma, the Ukraine gas firm that employed Hunter Biden as a board member, was mentioned in the Trump-Zelensky call, but was not present in the rough transcript. Vindman says it was “not a significant omission.”
9:55 A.M. — Vindman on Trump asking Zelensky to probe allegations of corruption against the Bidens: “It was inappropriate. It was improper for the president to request, to demand an investigation into a political opponent, especially a foreign power where there is at best dubious belief that this would be a completely impartial investigation.”
9:54 A.M. — Schiff asks Vindman for his real-time reaction to the Trump-Zelensky call. “Without hesitation, I knew I had to report my concerns,” he says.
9:52 A.M. — Vindman testifies that he advised Zelensky to steer clear of U.S. politics, stating it is consistent with U.S. domestic policy.
9:51 A.M. —
Vindman tells Schiff he had given talking points to Trump before his april call with Zelensky to talk about rooting out corruption in Ukraine. Vindman confirms that he did not use those talking points.
— Alana Abramson (@aabramson) November 19, 2019
9:50 A.M. — Rudy Giuliani, President Trump’s personal lawyer, weighs in on today’s hearings:
Congress and the Constitution stipulate it is the duty of the POTUS to investigate crimes and/or corruption in countries we give money to.@realDonaldTrump was fulfilling his legal obligation.
Schiff and Pelosi are making a mockery out of our system of justice!
— Rudy Giuliani (@RudyGiuliani) November 19, 2019
9:48 A.M. —
News: Schiff asks about a September 18 call between Pence & Zelensky. Williams’ attorney says Pence office now claims the call is classified, and she can’t talk about it in open setting.
— Garrett Haake (@GarrettHaake) November 19, 2019
9:47 A.M. — Vindman: “Dad, my sitting here today, in the U.S. Capitol, talking to our elected officials is proof that you made the right decision 40 years ago to leave the Soviet Union and come here to the U.S. in search of a better life for our family.”
Dad, do not worry. I will be fine for telling the truth,” he adds.
Vindman: “Dad, I am sitting here today in the U.S. Capitol. Talking to our elected professionals is proof you made the right decision 40 years ago to leave the Soviet Union…in search of a better life for our family. Do not worry. I will be fine for telling the truth.” pic.twitter.com/pbih27NbcL
— CBS Evening News (@CBSEveningNews) November 19, 2019
9:44 A.M. — Vindman: “In Russia, my act of expressing my concerns to the chain of command in an official and private channel would have severe personal and professional repercussions and offering public testimony involving the President would surely cost me my life.”
9:43 A.M. — Vindman: “I want to take a moment to recognize the courage of my colleagues who have appeared & are scheduled to appear before this committee. I want to state that the vile character attacks on these distinguished & honorable public servants is reprehensible”
9:42 A.M. — Vindman: “I privately reported my concerns, in official channels, to the proper authorities in the chain of command. My intent was to raise these concerns because they had significant national security implications for our country.”
Vindman on Trump’s call with Ukraine’s president: “I was concerned by the call. What I heard was inappropriate…It is improper for the president of the United States to demand a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen and a political opponent” https://t.co/OZ2lHu07Z6 pic.twitter.com/vYGSyqD3dA
— CBS News (@CBSNews) November 19, 2019
9:41 A.M. — Vindman: “It is improper for the President of the United States to demand a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen and political opponent. It was also clear that if Ukraine pursued an investigation. It would be interpreted as a partisan play.”
9:40 A.M. — Vindman: “The NSC and its inter-agency partners, including the State Department, grew increasingly concerned about the impact that such information was having on our country’s ability to achieve our national security objectives. “
9:39 A.M. — Vindman begins his opening statement: “At the NSC I am the principal advisor to the National Security Advisor and the President on Ukraine and the other countries in my portfolio. My core function is to coordinate policy with departments and agencies partners. “
Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council official who heard President Trump’s July 25 call with the Ukrainian president, delivers opening statement https://t.co/OZ2lHu07Z6 pic.twitter.com/b8HDilNa8U
— CBS News (@CBSNews) November 19, 2019
9:37 A.M. — Williams: “Representatives of the State and Defense Departments advocated that the hold [on military aid for Ukraine] should be lifted. An OMB representative reported the White House chief of staff had directed the hold should remain in place.”
9:35 A.M. — Williams: “I found the July 25th phone call unusual because, in contrast to other presidential calls I had observed, it involved discussion of what appeared to be a domestic political matter.”
9:33 A.M. — Williams begins her opening statement: “As a career officer, I am committed to serving the American people and advancing American interests abroad, in support of the President’s foreign policy objectives.”
Jennifer Williams, an aide to Vice President Mike Pence, delivers her opening statement: “It was with great pride and conviction that I swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution” https://t.co/OZ2lHu07Z6 pic.twitter.com/JROeeTwMV0
— CBS News (@CBSNews) November 19, 2019
9:32 A.M. — Fresh off attacking Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), George Conway lashes out at Nunes over his opening statement:
Nunes is an utter disgrace. His statement, and he, are pure garbage.
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) November 19, 2019
9:31 A.M. — Nunes on the so-called ‘whistleblower”:
.@RepDevinNunes continues to ask the questions that the media inexplicably will not: where is the “whistleblower”?
And he’s exactly right: the “whistleblower” kickstarted this latest round of impeachment mania by the Democrats, and then was no longer needed by the Democrats. pic.twitter.com/MMCh1IPJ8r
— Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) November 19, 2019
9:27 A.M. —
Nunes says last week’s testimony was second and third-hand witnesses with a simple policy difference. “You saw three diplomats” who “disagreed” with Ukraine policy. Today, however, 3/4 witnesses testifying were on the call between President Trump and the Ukrainian President. pic.twitter.com/XRQ0oSlkrP
— Samantha-Jo Roth (@SamanthaJoRoth) November 19, 2019
9:23 A.M. — Nunes defends former The Hill journalist John Solomon’s reporting on Ukraine: “Now that Solomon’s reporting is a problem for the Democrats, it’s a problem for the media as well.”
9:21 A.M. — Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) blasts the establishment media in his opening statement, calls them “puppets of the Democratic Party.”
Rep. Devin Nunes delivers opening remarks for third day of impeaching hearings https://t.co/OZ2lHu07Z6 pic.twitter.com/GpMyrSrHx3
— CBS News (@CBSNews) November 19, 2019
9:18 A.M. — Schiff on Jennifer Williams: “We all saw the President’s tweet about you on Sunday afternoon and the insults he hurled at Ambassador Yovanovich last Friday. You are here today, and the American people are grateful.”
9:17 A.M. — Schiff: “Col. Vindman, we have seen far more scurrilous attacks on your character, and watched as certain personalities on Fox have questioned your loyalty. I note that you have shed blood for America, and we owe you an immense debt of gratitude.”
9:16 A.M. — MORNING CONSULT: “The Nov. 15-17 survey found that 48 percent of voters support the inquiry and 45 percent oppose it, a net drop of 5 percentage points since a Nov. 8-10 poll.”
MORNING CONSULT: “First Public Hearings Fail to Increase Support for Impeachment Inquiry”
“Net voter support for impeachment inquiry hits a new low”https://t.co/PouBnOyg2i
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 19, 2019
9:15 A.M. — Schiff begins his opening statement:
Schiff: “How could our diplomats urge Ukraine to refrain from political investigations of its own citizens, if the president of the United States was urging Ukraine to engage in precisely the same kind of corrupt and political investigations of one of our own citizens?” pic.twitter.com/TF8tkxVSSv
— CBS News (@CBSNews) November 19, 2019
9:02 A.M. — Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ): “Vindman’s problem is that he’s a deep stater.”
I’m headed into the third public impeachment hearing to hear from 2 more of Adam Schiff’s witnesses. One of them, Alexander Vindman, appeared to avoid certain questions during his closed-door session from last month. We’ll see if Adam Schiff continues to block full transparency. pic.twitter.com/zaEyazrzuu
— Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) November 19, 2019
8:30 A.M. — Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and Jeniffer Williams have arrived on Capitol Hill for their joint testimony.
NEW VIDEO, PART II: We just caught Jennifer Williams walking into the Longworth House Office Building in the @KATUNews #LiveDesk. Williams, an aide to @VP Pence, will testify alongside Lt. Col. Vindman in this public #impeachment hearing this morning. #LiveOnK2 pic.twitter.com/IExVzXHD1P
— Evan Schreiber (@SchreiberEvan) November 19, 2019
Comments are closed.