FBI Requests Group’s Election Fraud Data That Shows ‘hundreds of thousands’ of Fraudulent Ballots; Judge Blocks, Then Unblocks Georgia From Wiping or Resetting Election Machines, and related stories

By admin On Nov 29, 2020

FBI requests group’s election fraud data that shows ‘hundreds of thousands’ of fraudulent ballots:

Amistad Project Director Phillip Kline announced that the FBI requested to look into former chief Trump campaign strategist’s Matt Braynard’s data on election fraud.

“After learning that hundreds of thousands of ballots are potentially fraudulent- The FBI has requested to look at our data,” Kline announced on Twitter Sunday.

After learning that hundreds of thousands of ballots are potentially fraudulent- The FBI has now requested to look at our data.

See statement below: pic.twitter.com/4CZKITK5cz

— Phillip Kline (@PhillDKline) November 29, 2020

Kline, the former attorney general of Kansas, now oversees the Thomas More Society’s litigation efforts related to 2020 election fraud.

“The Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society retained Matt Braynard and his team after Election Day to develop data analysis to cultivate as evidence to support election integrity lawsuits in the battleground states,” Kline said in an attached statement. “We’ve learned that Mr. Braynard was contacted by FBI Special Agent Young Oh of the FBI Los Angeles Field Office seeking our data. Mr. Braynard is cooperating with this request and we fully support him.” —>READ MORE HERE

Judge Blocks, Then Unblocks Georgia From Wiping or Resetting Election Machines:

A federal judge presiding over a major election lawsuit in Georgia on Nov. 29 issued and then reversed an order directing the state to cease and desist wiping or resetting election machines.

“Defendants are ordered to maintain the status quo & are temporarily enjoined from wiping or resetting any voting machines in the State of Georgia until further order of the court,” U.S. District Judge Timothy Batten Sr. wrote in an emergency order issued Nov. 29.

The judge reversed the order not long after, explaining that the defendants aren’t in possession of the machines.

“Plaintiffs’ request fails because the voting equipment that they seek to impound is in the possession of county election officials. Any injunction the Court issues would extend only to Defendants and those within their control, and Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that county election officials are within Defendants’ control. Defendants cannot serve as a proxy for local election officials against whom the relief should be sought,” the judge wrote.