US: It’s our long-standing position that the West Bank is occupied

The Biden administration on Wednesday clarified that it considers the West Bank to be an occupied territory, but ducked a question as to whether it held that settlements were illegal.

“It is a historical fact that Israel occupied the West Bank, Gaza, and the Golan Heights after the 1967 War,” US State Department spokesman Ned Price told reporters in Washington on Wednesday.

The issue was raised after the Biden administration published on Tuesday the 2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. It’s the first of the annual reports released since US President Joe Biden took office in January 2021. 

The report affirmed steps taken by the previous Trump administration, which had both recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.

It also kept in place a description change former US president Donald Trump had made to the report, in which he replaced the phrase “Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories” with “Israel, West Bank and Gaza.”

But within the report, the Biden administration reintroduced the word “occupied” to describe Israel’s seizure of territory during the 1967 Six-Day War. 

When quizzed by a reporter as to whether Israel considered that Israel occupied the West Bank, Price affirmed that it did.

“In fact, the 2020 Human Rights Report does use the term “occupation” in the context of the current status of the West Bank. This has been the longstanding position of previous administrations of both parties over the course of many decades,” Price said.

Israel has long argued that the West Bank does not meet the standard of occupied territory, because it captured that territory from Jordan, whose sovereignty there from 1948-1967 was not recognized legally and which itself was considered to occupy that territory.

Prior to the 1948 War of Independence, the territory was held by Great Britain and prior World War I, it was part of the Ottoman Empire.

The Trump administration believed that Israel had historic and religious rights to portions of that territory and did not refer to it as occupied. It’s top officials agreed with the Israeli right, that the proper term was Judea and Samaria and not the West Bank, terminology linked to the time when the territory was under Jordanian rule.

Trump also changed US policy toward Israeli West Bank settlements. It rejected a 1978 memo by then US State Department Legal Advisor Herbert J. Hansell declaring that the settlements were illegal, declaring instead that they were not inconsistent with Israeli law.

The United Nations holds that Israel’s settlements are illegal and that the West Bank is occupied Palestinian territory.

The Biden administration has yet to clarify its stance on the settlements, even though it is presumed to support a two-state solution at the pre-1967 lines.

At Wednesday’s press conference a reporter asked Price, “Does the US consider, for example, Israeli settlements in the occupied territories to be illegal as a result of this stance?”

Price responded that the US position had not changed, but he clarified that stance his way.

“We – as you have heard me say before, we continue to encourage all sides to avoid actions – both sides, I should say – to avoid actions that would put the two-state solution further out of reach. 

“Again, our ultimate goal here is to facilitate – to help bring about – a two-state solution because it is the best path to preserve Israel’s identity as a Jewish and democratic state while bestowing on the Palestinians their legitimate aspirations of sovereignty and dignity in a state of their own,” he said.

These lines are often his and other Biden official’s standard response to many questions about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.