Dr. Redfield’s Covid Origin testimony is absolutely damning for Fauci…
Dr. Robert Redfield, the former CDC Director, talks about three suspicious events that took place at the Wuhan lab in September 2019:
“In Sept. 2019, three things happened in that lab. One is they deleted the sequences. Highly irregular, researchers don’t like to do that. The… https://t.co/YjHfyEok1g pic.twitter.com/nIT5b96AbE
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) March 8, 2023
Dr. Robert Redfield, the former CDC Director, talks about three suspicious events that took place at the Wuhan lab in September 2019 — In Sept. 2019, three things happened in that lab. One is they deleted the sequences. Highly irregular, researchers don’t like to do that. The second thing is they changed the command and control from civilian to military. Highly unusual. The third, which is very telling, is they let a contractor redo the ventilation system in that laboratory. Clearly, there was strong evidence that a significant event happened in that laboratory in September.
Dr. Robert Redfield, the former CDC Director, explains why he believes SARS-CoV-2 is probably the result of gain-of-function research conducted at the Wuhan lab:
“Dr. Fauci’s position, as those who thought it was a spillover took the position because that’s what happened with… https://t.co/u63dcCiYRs pic.twitter.com/6JwbC7eRt7
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) March 8, 2023
Dr. Robert Redfield explains why he believes SARS-CoV-2 is probably the result of gain-of-function research conducted at the Wuhan lab — “Dr. Fauci’s position, as those who thought it was a spillover took the position because that’s what happened with SARS and MERS. It’s important to look at prior to 2012; we weren’t doing gain-of-function research. SARS and MERS never learned how to go human to human, so those original outbreaks were less than one thousand people, and the epidemics died. But this virus was immediately the most infectious virus behind measles that we’ve ever seen. So I immediately said, wait a second; this isn’t natural. Then you go back and look at the literature, and in 2014 this lab actually published a paper in which they put the ACE2 receptor in humanized mice so it can infect human tissue, and then you learn that the new covid, which came from bats, can hardly replicate in bats. So how does that happen?”
Dr. Robert Redfield, the former CDC Director, says Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins excluded him from meetings because they wanted to maintain control over the narrative surrounding the origin of SARS-CoV-2:
“As a virologist, this wasn’t anything like SARS or MERS because they never… https://t.co/YF7AFWwDZ4 pic.twitter.com/xE1IRRXE6m
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) March 8, 2023
Dr. Robert Redfield says Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins excluded him from meetings because they wanted to maintain control over the narrative surrounding the origin of SARS-CoV-2:
“As a virologist, this wasn’t anything like SARS or MERS because they never learned how to transmit human to human. I felt this virus was too infectious for humans; there was a lot of evidence that the lab published in 2014 that they put the ACE2 receptor into humanized mice so it could infect human tissue. I didn’t know I was excluded; I didn’t know there was a February 1st conference call until the FOIA came out with the emails, and I was quite upset as the CDC director that I was excluded… they came up with a single narrative which I will argue is antithetical to science.”
Dr. Robert Redfield, the former CDC Director, believes that US taxpayer money from NIH, State Department, USAID, and DOD funded the creation of SARS-CoV-2:
“They wanted a single narrative, and I had a different point of view… Science has debate, and they squashed any debate…… https://t.co/JjiaH6SMun pic.twitter.com/yuIBJ7o6gg
— kanekoa.substack.com (@KanekoaTheGreat) March 8, 2023
Dr. Robert Redfield believes that US taxpayer money from NIH, State Department, USAID, and DOD funded the creation of SARS-CoV-2: “They wanted a single narrative, and I had a different point of view… Science has debate, and they squashed any debate… I think it’s an inaccurate paper that was part of a narrative that they were creating… I think there’s no doubt that NIH was funding gain of function research.”
Full Hearing
Comments are closed.