April 12, 2023

There are some sad truths that have become blatantly clear in the hate-filled public forum of the 21st century.  Public figures are often attacked in the media.  Conservatives even more so.  And if you’re a high-profile conservative, then the left has no compunctions in their attacks on you, and everyone you may interact with.  These truths have truly become self evident in the 21st century chaos that is Biden’s America.

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609268089992-0’); }); }

Enter Justice Clarence Thomas and businessman Harlan Crow.  Two men who are being incessantly attacked and lied about not because of their actions, but because of their longstanding friendship.

Let’s start with the relationship itself, and whether it is appropriate for a judge.  According to reports, the men and their wives have been social friends for close to three decades.  Like all friends, they share common interests, meals, and even may vacation together.  But Mr. Crow is a businessman and donor to conservative organizations; and the question arises if a social friendship like this is a good or bad thing for a Justice, and as a result, for our nation.

If we look at the history of judges going all the way back to the bible, the answer is that this type of relationship is not only appropriate for a judge, but necessary.

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609270365559-0’); }); }

The modern concept and practices of judges goes back to biblical times, even to Moses.  At Jethro’s recommendation (Exodus 18:13-26), Moses appoints judges that render judgment of the ancient Hebrews while still being active members of the community.  They are not to be separated from the community, but to be active participants within it.  Enjoined to be men of “wisdom, discernment, and knowledge” (Deut. 1:13); later commentaries from Talmud to Rashi and Maimonides require that judges be part of the community they judge, and have the seven qualities of “wisdom, humility, fear of God, disdain of gain, love of truth, love of people, and a good reputation”.  As Rabbi Hillel said 2000 years ago, “Do not separate yourself from the community”.

The idea of judges having friendships within the community is possibly best expressed in the text of Pirkei Avot, one of Judaism’s most sacred texts written over 2000 years ago.  “Make for yourself a teacher, acquire for yourself a friend” is a famous quote that recognizes the importance of friends and teachers, and the truth that we often learn most deeply from our friends.  It is mandatory that judges have personal friendships that deepen their humanity and wisdom without entering into the judicial decision-making process.

Based on these primary religious concepts, it is vitally important for a judge to have friendships such as the one between the Thomas and Crow families.  Their relationship, like any longstanding friendship, deepens the Justice’s wisdom and appreciation of life.  By biblical standards, this type of relationship is not only beneficial to a judge, but necessary.  It is a religious requirement that Justice Thomas has deep personal relationships like this one with the Crows to help him be a balanced individual…making him a more discerning and wiser judge with a “love of people”.  A judge with real friends remains steeped in the human condition, and it keeps his judgments from becoming edicts emanating from an ivory tower.

But should anyone, let alone a Justice, be a friend with a Nazi lover?  This is what is what so many leftist media outlets are now additionally accusing Mr. Crow of being; and simultaneously attacking the Justice for their friendship.

But these lies about Mr. Crow being a Hitler lover were started years ago by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a woman who betrayed all Jewish values in perpetuating fallacious vitriol about Mr. Crow.

I addressed Rep. Schultz’s despicable behavior almost eight years ago in an article for the Jewish Journal, the nation’s largest weekly Jewish periodical outside of New York City.  Simply put, her accusations are not only disgusting, but antithetical to Jewish theology.