Spoilers abound.
“Star Trek” has always sailed the cosmos on the unearthly wind of left-wing pieties, but a message more inhuman than mere collectivism and leftism emerges in “Star Trek: Picard.”
The original 1960s series hewed to the Prime Directive, an anti-colonialist maxim that, while never expressly stated, charged the voyagers of Starfleet to interfere as little as possible with whatever civilizations they might encounter.
The show, with its multi-species cast, gestured toward nuclear disarmament and featured what was probably broadcast television’s first interracial kiss.
So, too, with the first batch of “Star Trek” movies. Those of us old enough to have seen “Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan” in theaters will remember the thrill of Spock’s sacrifice, which allowed the Starship Enterprise’s crew to escape the doom of their enemies, who are consumed in an explosion moments later.
I wonder how many wept at a line he shares with Kirk: “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.” That is a noble sentiment, especially in the context of a desperate battle. As a general principle, though, it leaves something to be desired.
It is refreshing at first glance, then, that the most recent Trek series, “Star Trek: Picard,” which recently concluded on Paramount Plus, had anti-collectivist themes.
The show portrays a good bit of science-fiction cloak-and-dagger adventures, involving shape-shifting spies and sentient androids and so forth, before revealing the true villain: a shriveled, lonely Borg Queen, bereft of her Collective of shared minds and hungry for a particular mind — someone close to the hero, Admiral Jean-Luc Picard.
Picard finds himself called from his idyllic French vineyards back to the depths of space, where he reunites one by one with his old crew members from “Star Trek: The Next Generation.”
They zip around the stars, shooting lasers at bad guys. They run around on distant planets, doing the same. They apologize for past mistakes and gaze wistfully at computer consoles on the wall. Nostalgia oozes from every conversation and glance.
Yet behind the nostalgia, there is something far more sinister at the show’s heart.
At the end of the first season, Picard dies while battling the shape-shifting enemies. But then he does not stay dead because his very person — his entire human consciousness — is uploaded into a simulacrum of himself. Let’s call it an android. The show then carries on as though this thing — this mechanism carrying Picard’s mind — were Picard himself.
The term for this conceit, in which a human being can be reduced to binary code as if the flesh were a meat vehicle for some pure Cartesian mind, is transhumanism. And “Star Trek: Picard” boldly explores transhumanist territory further than any other “Star Trek” before it.
“The Next Generation” played with transhumanist ideas, with the question of robot Commander Data’s personhood coming up now and then. He is sentient but lacks feeling and empathy. So however likable he may be, is he anything more than a machine?
In “Picard,” Data somehow leaps into true, empathetic personhood. The show does not quite spell out how it happens, and he finds it a little confusing, too. But, in his robot mind, he fights a wicked version of himself and wins, and voila! This, too, is pernicious nonsense.
Everybody is all het up lately about whether ChatGPT and its ilk have attained consciousness. They have not. They never will. They will only ever present a remarkable likeness of it.
So, too, good old Data, who, in the end, fools himself and everybody else. The show’s writers do not seem to understand the implications of being able to reduce a human person to code — let alone to construct one on that basis.
And so, to the Big Bad, the old Borg Queen. She has made the shapeshifters embed Picard’s Borg-altered DNA (because he was assimilated back in the day) into Starfleet’s transporter systems. All the folks who got disassembled and reassembled via transporter get that DNA mixed in with theirs.
(Come to think of it, the transporter technology itself seems sort of reductive, no? You are just some bytes, moved from here to there.)
Then the queen gets her transmitter going, and infected individuals turn on Starfleet, fighting on the Borg Collective’s behalf. This represents a shift from the Borg’s methods of control in earlier series, which required an analog, electrical insertion of impulses into the brain.
That, too, is somewhat reductive, but not so much as the altered DNA, which assumes that computer coding can transform into sequences that alter DNA. It assumes that things that can be expressed in numbers are necessarily equivalent to other things that can be expressed in numbers.
There is no thought about — God forbid — the inherent nature of a thing or a being. Everything is subject to manipulation.
And so “Picard” gives way to a temptation far worse than collectivism, which at least gestures toward human aims and desires. The show, at bottom, despises the merely human. It reduces the human person to digits. In so doing, it makes humans individually and collectively subject to the same people who are programming the machines.
In trying to tell a story of friendship and duty and sacrifice, all “Star Trek: Picard” ends up doing is creating the Matrix.
G.L. Ford lives and works in Victoria, Texas. He is the author of Sans, a book of poems (Ugly Duckling Presse, 2017). He edited the 6×6 poetry periodical from 2000 to 2016, and formerly wrote a column for the free paper New York Nights.
Comments are closed.