Pacific allies want more exercises with US, munitions similar to what US is sending to Ukraine
FORT SHAFTER, Hawaii-U.S. allies in the Pacific, with an eye on Ukraine, are asking U.S forces to convene larger joint force exercises and requesting M142 HIMARS capabilities and howitzer rounds—munitions that have been critical to Ukraine’s resistance to Russian aggression, but that are also in short supply.
“Frankly, our allies and partners are watching very closely what’s happening in Ukraine. They’re very interested in how they preserve their territorial integrity,” Army Brig. Gen. James Bartholomees, chief of staff to United States Army Pacific, or USAPAC, told Defense One during an exclusive interview in Hawaii.
Both Australia and Taiwan are scheduled to operate HIMARS in the future. But there are other ways the United States can get the system to other regional partners.
The military has been conducting live-fire exercises with the Philippines, Japan, Australia, and other countries in the region recently. “All of those are synchronized with the ally or partner and their equivalent capability so that we can conduct rehearsals of how we would employ those fires. So from a HIMARS perspective, yes…high demand.”
But all of that demand could put a strain on the supply of HIMARS artillery, particularly given the intense need for those munitions in Ukraine. And 155-millimeter howitzer shells are also in demand in the Indo-Pacific. “We are actually seeing some demand there. And that munition challenge with 155s, it’s significant,” particularly by the Indian armed forces, he said.
The Army’s Multi-Domain Task Force, or MDTF, teams, have a long-range fires battalion. In May, one of the MDTF teams completed an exercise with the Philippines. Next month, there’s a similar exercise in Indonesia—Super Garuda Shield—which will also include a long-range fires component, but not an MDTF team.
Said Bartholomees, exercises like Super Garuda Shield are growing in scope and complexity, at the request of the host countries who want to test how well they can operate as a joint service, but also with partner nations in the region for a unified front. That’s a big change from previous exercises, where militaries would look to more modest objectives.
Now, says Bartholomees, “the conversation is more going to ‘Hey, how do we rehearse together if we were going to fight as a combined force? How would we exercise all of these capabilities?’”
Pacific nations may not want to host a big U.S. long-range missile battery pointed at China, but the ability to host and train with long-range fires teams is a part of the draw, Bartholomees said. “We’re finding there’s a thirst for that, because they want the training that comes with it. And that’s something we didn’t really anticipate.”
United States Indo-Pacific Command is working to bring more domains and partners into its exercises. And they are quickly working up new digital interfaces, such as a new mission partner environment, to allow very different militaries to share data and work together quickly.
That doesn’t necessarily mean every nation in the Pacific is interested in providing a unified front to China in every possible scenario. And because there is no formal military alliance among them, it’s unclear which nations might come to the aid of Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion. But regional players like the Philippines are becoming more bold in discussing China, if not exactly as a threat, then at least the primary motivation for their desire to train with one another and train harder. “There’s a much more overt discussion,” about that, Bartholomees said.
Even without a formal mutual defense treaty or alliance, regional players will play a key role in any potential conflict in the Pacific and in deterring one, he said.
The Chinese military has some key advantages when it comes to a Pacific fight: the overwhelming size of their military, the large number of rockets and fires they have (also known as magazine depth), and their internal logistics and resupply lines, Bartholomees said.
“We may not be able to counter the mass. We can through allies and partners so that needs to build over time. The magazine depth is an industrial issue that, obviously, all of our nations are fighting to get on top of. But interior lines are something that we can influence through campaigning forward, having forced his posture forward.”
Comments are closed.