The Most Logical (and Treacherous) Reason Yet for Joe Biden’s Open Border; Apportionment and the Census: Fundamental Fairness to U.S. Citizens and Democratic Process, AND RELATED STORIES

The Most Logical (and Treacherous) Reason Yet for Joe Biden’s Open Border:

How bad is America’s Southern border invasion? So bad that even Joe “I’ll Never Build a Wall” Biden is talking about building a wall at the Southern border. Sure, the guy who sold off construction materials left behind by Donald Trump’s border wall crews will close the border. If you believe that, you’ll believe that Joe Biden is a great father and wonderful dog owner, too. Here’s a clue: that dog won’t hunt, either.

Soon after radio host and constitutional expert Mark Levin began giving voice to the idea that Joe Biden could be impeached right now based on the open southern border leaving Americans unsafe and unsecured, Joe’s White House decided to rattle the chains in hopes that lo-fo American voters and Joe Scarborough would think that he’s for closed borders. Homie, please.

Like so many other millions of people, New York Post reporter Miranda Devine wondered why any American president—even clueless Joe—would leave America’s back door wide open.

She asked,

Does anyone here understand why the Biden administration is persisting with the suicidal open border? They could stop it tomorrow but they just lie that it’s “secure”. The issue will be a vote killer in the 2024 election. Why aren’t they pivoting? Is it a scam to get voters for 2024? What are the mechanics of illegals voting? Is it a more long term strategy to shore up sagging Democratic appeal? Or is it a pet project of Biden’s to please Pope Francis in the mistaken belief it will save his soul?

Does anyone here understand why the Biden administration is persisting with the suicidal open border? They could stop it tomorrow but they just lie that it’s “secure”. The issue will be a vote killer at the 2024 election. Why aren’t they pivoting? Is it a scam to get voters for…

— Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) October 2, 2023

You can understand why she struggled for answers. We’ve all been wondering why Biden would be opening the Southern border, allowing in potentially some of the worst actors from the prisons south of the border and hell’s half acre pushing out the local war heroes and Army-Navy game-goers to make their home in the US of A.

Faster than you can say, “They’ll vote Democrat,” there’s another, more convincing, shocking, tectonic, and treacherous answer. And since you’ve seen what the left has done and can only imagine what they will do, this border gambit makes sense. Sick and disgusting sense. —>READ MORE HERE

Apportionment and the Census: Fundamental Fairness to U.S. Citizens and Democratic Process:

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

• States may gain or lose seats after every census, depending on population shifts and as the total population of the country increases. 
• The growing alien population is unfairly and unjustly altering the political representation of the states in the House of Representatives.
• Congress should pass legislation changing the apportionment formula to mandate that it be based solely on the citizen population of the country.

Americans just voted for their representatives in the House of Representatives in the 2022 midterm election, and two years ago, they completed census forms. Both of those activities are the direct result of Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution—the census clause—which directs that an “actual Enumeration” be conducted every “ten Years” of our population “in such Manner as [Congress] shall by Law direct.”

Although the census is used for many different purposes, including the distribution of federal funds to states, the primary constitutional purpose of the “Enumeration” is apportionment—the determination of the number of seats to which each state is entitled in the House. As Section 2 of the 14th Amendment provides, “Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective number, counting the whole number of persons in each State.”

For the first 150 years of our history, the House kept growing as new states were admitted to the Union. But in 1929, Congress passed the Permanent Apportionment Act that limited its size to 435 members. Thus, states may gain or lose seats after every census, depending on population shifts and as the total population of the country increases.

That determination is made under a calculation laid out in federal law known as the “method of equal proportions.” But no matter how small the population of a state is, each state is entitled to at least one representative under the census clause. —>READ MORE HERE

Follow links below to related stories:

The Impact of Legal and Illegal Immigration on the Apportionment of Seats in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2020



Reversing Donald Trump policy, Joe Biden will include undocumented immigrants in critical census count

If you like what you see, please “Like” and/or Follow us on FACEBOOK here, GETTR here, and TWITTER here.

Source