AI Is Rigged

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609268078422-0’); }); document.write(”); googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.pubads().addEventListener(‘slotRenderEnded’, function(event) { if (event.slot.getSlotElementId() == “div-hre-Americanthinker—New-3027”) { googletag.display(“div-hre-Americanthinker—New-3027”); } }); }); } if (publir_show_ads) { document.write(“

It’s crucial to understand the magnitude of the A.I. problem.  A.I. is not a neutral, fact-based device that only makes workers more productive and our lives easier.  A.I. at heart is a man-made computer program, and that design appears to reflect the biases of the left.

Just to check my assumption once again, I typed in, “Do transgender adolescents regret gender-affirming treatment later in life?”  I received a long answer complete with scientific references from places like the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (bet most readers didn’t know that WPATH actually exists) and an unspecified Dutch research study concluding that “none of the youth in adulthood regretted the decisions they had made during adolescence.”  None?

In conclusion, A.I. informs us that “while regret exists in some cases [about 1%], it is not a common outcome.”

This A.I.-generated answer failed to consider a 2022 New York Post article by Rikki Schlott on “Why detransitioned teens regret changing genders.”  The information in this article is extremely troubling.  As Schlott points out, “many will struggle for the rest of their lives with the irreversible medical consequences of a decision they made as minors.”

“Transitioning regret” is more common than A.I. leads us to believe.  There are numerous social and media pressures on adolescents and children that may lead them to “transition,” but as Schlott points out, “a variety of studies suggest that as many as 80% of dysphoric children could ultimately experience “desistance” — or coming to terms with their biological gender without resorting to transition.”  In other words, 80% of those who transition are only experiencing temporary unease with their sex and might be better off not transitioning.

My copilot fails to cover any of these points.  In fact, A.I. presents what I consider a very one-sided response to my question.  A.I. may even be part of those social and media forces pressuring young people to attempt to change their sex.  On this as on so many other questions, I do not find A.I. neutral or reliable.

So what happens as society becomes increasingly reliant on A.I. for quick answers to complex questions?  What happens is that simplistic answers with a liberal bias are institutionalized within our culture to the point that it becomes difficult to refute them.  Those who raise sensitive questions about gun control, sex, or the environment will simply be referred back to A.I., which provides the same progressive answer every time.

In this way, A.I. may well become the ontological basis of the authoritarian left-wing culture that now threatens America.  As Orwell wrote in 1984, “power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing.”  A.I. and social media in general are, I believe, “tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again,” and for much the same reason as depicted in 1984: the pursuit of power for its own sake.

America has moved dangerously close to becoming an Orwellian state, where electorates are blocked from voting for competing candidates, competing candidates are repeatedly hauled into court just at the time when they need to be campaigning, schools are controlled by ideologues who believe that parents have no role in their children’s education, universities in the hands of radical leftists allow attacks on Jews, homosexual and trans propaganda is shoved down our throats, those with religious convictions are overruled by radicals in the so-called Justice Department, government spending threatens to collapse the economy (after which the left will step in with “solutions” that involve the seizure of private capital), and a host of other matters.

In all of this, A.I. has the potential to serve as a powerful tool for the suppression of reasonable conservative thinking.  Stop it while we can, or we may never have the chance again.

Jeffrey Folks is the author of many books and articles on American culture including Heartland of the Imagination (2011).

Image via Unsplash.

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

American Thinker