ICC prosecutor in veiled warning to Netanyahu: Stop intimidation tactics
The International Criminal Court’s Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan issued a veiled warning to Netanyahu to stop his intimidation tactics designed to prevent the issuance of arrest warrants against top Israeli leaders for war crimes, including in Gaza.
“The Office insists that all attempts to impede, intimidate or improperly influence its officials cease immediately,” he wrote in a post on X.
He spoke out after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other top Israeli leaders had issued statements against the issuance of such warrants and US politicians had threatened to reimpose sanctions the Trump administration had leveled against the court, but which were rescinded by US President Joe Biden.
Discussions between Israel and the United States
Israeli President Isaac Herzog brought up the issue when he met with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Wednesday.
There is a belief in the Prime Minister’s Office, that US intervention could be helpful. The ICC has not formally announced the issuance of such warrants, which are expected to target Netanyahu, Defense Minster Yoav Gallant and IDF Chief-of-Staff Herzl Halevi.
Khan in his post did not mention Israel, the US or Netanyahu, but his statement is broadly believed to be applicable to his investigation into war crimes committed in Gaza, the West Bank and east Jerusalem over the last decade.
The “independence and impartiality are undermined, however, when individuals threaten to retaliate against the Court or against Court personnel should the Office, in fulfilment of its mandate, make decisions about investigations or cases falling within its jurisdiction,” Khan wrote.
“Such threats, even when not acted upon, may also constitute an offense against the administration of justice under Art. 70 of the Rome Statute,” he waned.
That provision explicitly prohibits both “[r]etaliating against an official of the Court on account of duties performed by that or another official” and “[I]mpeding, intimidating or corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of forcing or persuading the official not to perform or to perform improperly, his or her duties,” Khan stressed….
Comments are closed.