Major Israeli General Declares This Warning To Israel: ‘The US Will Not Stop Iran’s Nuclear Program. We Will See More Destruction In Israel.’

The former US Secretary of State stated that an American military attack on Iranian nuclear facilities would not be enough, and therefore agreements must also be reached. Inspectors sent by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to verify that the Iranians are not violating the agreement signed between the United States and Iran during the Obama administration claimed that the United States is unable to neutralize Iran’s nuclear development capability with a military attack alone.

This is because there are sites located a thousand meters underground, and all that will be achieved will be a certain suspension, but not a complete elimination of Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Therefore, without a diplomatic agreement, Iran will be able to achieve a nuclear bomb. Iran already has the fissile material to produce ten nuclear bombs, and there are experts who claim that Iran already has several nuclear bombs that they bought from North Korea or Pakistan.

…

In addition, Witkoff, the American envoy, made an unusual statement about Iran’s missile capabilities, saying that “this is an existential threat no less than the nuclear threat.” White House envoy Steve Witkoff warned senior Republican senators that Iran could respond to an Israeli attack on its nuclear facilities with a large-scale missile attack that would overcome Israeli defense systems and cause widespread damage and casualties . According to American intelligence estimates, Iran has about 2,000 ballistic missiles with warheads capable of carrying a ton of explosives, reaching all parts of Israel.

Iran’s goal is for the number of its missiles to exceed the number of Israeli missiles, since each Israeli interceptor missile costs three and a half million dollars, and for a large portion of the enemy’s ballistic missiles, Israel launches two Arrow missiles for each ballistic missile in order to ensure its destruction (at a cost of seven million dollars to destroy one enemy missile).

…

Despite the very impressive success of the Air Force in its attack on Iran, which unfortunately will not result in the elimination of Iran’s nuclear capability and the production of nuclear bombs (the United States also admits that it does not have the ability to stop Iranian nuclear armament with a military strike alone, and therefore a diplomatic agreement is necessary), this attack is of great importance in its deterrent element also with respect to other enemy countries.It should also be taken into account that, as the war continues, we will see more and more severe destruction of infrastructure and homes in the center of the country, as we have seen and are seeing in the Gaza Envelope and in the settlements on the northern border as a result of the “Iron Swords” war. In addition, Israel will not be able to continue the war for a long time due to the paralysis of economic activity in Israel and the disconnection from the world in the areas of aviation, trade and business, which could lead to an economic collapse, which would severely damage the ability to continue to move the wheels of war both in the air and on land.

…

I am concerned that the maneuver that Trump did to Israel in his agreement with the Houthis, in which he agreed with the Houthis that he would stop the United States’ bombing of them on the condition that the Houthis stop their attacks on American ships – in this agreement he did not include Israel and only cared about the United States, when in the agreement Trump did not deny the Houthis the right to continue launching missiles at Israel and also to attack Israeli ships.Trump sees almost exclusively the good of the United States, and does not consider anyone else. As long as Israel is an asset to him, he will help it, as soon as he thinks that Israel is weak and a burden that prevents him from advancing his goals, he will turn his back on it. Trump is a businessman whose worldview focuses on profit and loss, on expediency alone.Is it impossible that Trump, who does not want to get involved in a war with Iran that could lead to a full-scale regional escalation with the intervention of Iran’s friends – Russia, China and even North Korea – decided that the United States would not intervene in an attack along with Israel , but would only help it with defense and logistics as its friend, provided that the Iranian response was not against US bases in the Middle East? Trump would say to himself: “Let the boys (Israel) play in front of me,” Iran would take a hard blow from Israel that might bring it to a new nuclear agreement, Israel would take one too, and the United States would emerge unscathed.